Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_19.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=CGGG FASTA(n).Sequence=CGGG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:52
Evaluating how sequences fit models
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score     -10.13, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -5.63, deficit -1.04, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
UUGA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.78, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.36, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.34, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  56.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.22, deficit  0.01, CutoffScore  68.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.18, deficit -0.03, CutoffScore  68.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
ACGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.18, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.24, deficit  1.04, CutoffScore  89.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.08, deficit -1.13, CutoffScore  48.73, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.27, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  67.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.17, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  58.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUUGU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.65, deficit  1.72, CutoffScore  50.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.42, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.26, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  67.78, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  70.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  70.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGGU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.39, deficit  2.46, CutoffScore  74.15, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
ACCGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.98, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AAAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.13, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  85.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GCCAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -5.44, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  76.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  97.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.33, deficit  3.13, CutoffScore  67.08, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76094.1,  5 NTs,                 CAAUG,score      -4.26, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  53.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
AAACU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.35, deficit  0.05, CutoffScore  67.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  91.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -6.47, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  77.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
UCUUA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  58.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
ACUAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.39, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  76.17, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.30, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UUCGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -3.30, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.98, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  63.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.67, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCUCC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  66.99, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUCU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -7.74, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore  60.73, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.65, deficit  1.72, CutoffScore  50.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score      -6.39, deficit  3.17, CutoffScore  45.73, ed  2, 1 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
CUGCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score      -5.29, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  81.79, ed  1, 0 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
CUCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.05, deficit  5.29, CutoffScore  44.85, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCGUAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.58, deficit  0.52, CutoffScore  62.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
ACCGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -7.08, deficit  0.72, CutoffScore  60.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.38, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  65.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.33, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  66.03, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.12, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.31, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
CAGGUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.56, deficit  0.68, CutoffScore  61.29, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
CAUUUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.85, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  79.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
CUACAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.94, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  49.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.90, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  67.21, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUGAAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.79, deficit  4.27, CutoffScore  59.01, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
AAUCGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.20, deficit  1.26, CutoffScore  55.14, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.44, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore  40.76, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAGCAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -5.93, deficit -0.17, CutoffScore  70.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUCUA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -9.87, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  80.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCACCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -10.22, deficit  8.46, CutoffScore  11.81, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAAAAU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.30, deficit  5.55, CutoffScore  42.19, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GACCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.16, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GUCAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAGCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.66, deficit  4.90, CutoffScore  48.95, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.56, deficit  1.80, CutoffScore  81.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUGCUU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.72, deficit  0.84, CutoffScore  59.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GGUGAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.65, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  59.45, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAUUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.19, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  65.78, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAUGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.36, deficit  1.16, CutoffScore  56.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCGAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -8.20, deficit  5.19, CutoffScore  45.37, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGCGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.72, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.17, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.21, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  46.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUUCAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -7.97, deficit  4.17, CutoffScore  56.15, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUGUCU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score     -10.55, deficit  7.35, CutoffScore  22.64, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUCAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -5.83, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  78.64, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUCGAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -7.08, deficit  0.72, CutoffScore  60.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.64, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  73.55, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.98, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  66.43, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.28, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  73.77, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUAAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.35, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAUGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.73, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  83.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCUCGA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -7.26, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  85.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  51.12, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.32, deficit -0.60, CutoffScore  43.15, ed  3, 2 cWW                                     
GGACAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.35, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  52.19, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCCAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.08, deficit  0.95, CutoffScore  58.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUCGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -8.64, deficit  3.04, CutoffScore  36.37, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCAGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.01, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  53.61, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAGCAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.48, deficit  2.02, CutoffScore  15.61, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.61, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  26.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUAUCGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.29, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  57.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.67, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  59.26, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCAGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -7.82, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  15.01, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.24, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  51.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUUGAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.59, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  55.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCCGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.59, deficit  4.11, CutoffScore  56.69, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.09, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  47.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.99, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  38.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.39, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore   6.03, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.87, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  81.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUGUACA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.38, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  64.93, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.65, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  50.46, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCCUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.40, deficit -0.39, CutoffScore  40.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAUCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.98, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  32.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGUUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -6.03, deficit  2.31, CutoffScore  46.63, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -7.06, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  52.29, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.26, deficit -1.14, CutoffScore  48.80, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCAUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.01, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  55.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.27, deficit  4.34, CutoffScore  22.75, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCUUUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.02, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  38.40, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGUAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.72, deficit  1.16, CutoffScore  56.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
ACUUUGU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.04, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  38.20, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.00, deficit  4.24, CutoffScore  55.81, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -8.09, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  28.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGUAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -10.25, deficit  4.16, CutoffScore  24.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAUGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.31, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  48.99, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.76, deficit  5.00, CutoffScore  47.84, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAUUUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.73, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.58, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UACAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -8.94, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  16.25, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGAACC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -5.81, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  66.06, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAGAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -7.85, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  46.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGCAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -5.66, deficit -0.39, CutoffScore  72.53, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAUUCA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.18, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  63.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  65.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
UUCAGAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.92, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  35.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGUCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.77, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.96, deficit  2.60, CutoffScore  41.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGAUCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  66.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUAACG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.06, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  50.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGAACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -7.13, deficit -0.07, CutoffScore  42.98, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCUGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.98, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  10.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.46, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.61, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
AGAAUGU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.20, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  72.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GGAAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.76, deficit  5.00, CutoffScore  47.84, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUCGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.17, deficit  0.70, CutoffScore  29.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUAACGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.32, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  27.03, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UACGGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -11.93, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  20.57, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAUUAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -8.09, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  47.39, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAAACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -8.33, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  17.08, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.15, deficit  3.58, CutoffScore  28.70, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.07, deficit  0.34, CutoffScore  38.83, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUUUGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.18, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  55.93, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCUCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.74, deficit  3.11, CutoffScore  24.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
GUGAAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -6.73, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GACGAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score     -11.75, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore  27.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCAACGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.62, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.93, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAGCAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.13, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  56.68, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCCUAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.09, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  30.19, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GUCAGCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore  25.90, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUGACAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.06, deficit  0.27, CutoffScore  69.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.69, deficit  1.30, CutoffScore  54.72, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCAAGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.69, deficit  2.78, CutoffScore  53.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGGAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  55.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCCUAUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -7.38, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore  28.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGACCAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.34, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  59.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AAAAAACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  66.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGACGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -11.01, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore   2.64, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUUCAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -7.95, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore  10.00, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.18, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  49.68, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAUCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.60, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.16, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGACUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.33, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  22.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUGGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.20, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  35.26, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAAGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.78, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAUUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.12, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  41.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CGUGUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.21, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  34.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GGAUAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -7.78, deficit  5.05, CutoffScore  35.38, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUAAACAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.84, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  40.63, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAAGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.66, deficit  0.27, CutoffScore  65.53, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCUAAACG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -6.92, deficit -0.59, CutoffScore  51.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -8.66, deficit  5.93, CutoffScore  52.41, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.34, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  36.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCAAAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.39, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  89.42, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUAACUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -12.20, deficit  7.46, CutoffScore  26.62, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -6.68, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.93, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAAAGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.82, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  92.79, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -9.53, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore  24.26, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGUGUCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.48, deficit  0.46, CutoffScore  40.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GCCGAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -9.29, deficit  4.12, CutoffScore  38.78, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
ACAGGCAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.14, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  41.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GAAGAGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.09, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  40.02, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCAAAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.39, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  89.42, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGCAAAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.54, deficit  2.15, CutoffScore  45.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAACAAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.09, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  81.06, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAUGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.95, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  52.01, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAACGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -13.84, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore  21.39, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCCAAAUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -15.42, deficit 11.14, CutoffScore   4.39, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.92, deficit  3.13, CutoffScore  42.76, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CAAUACCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.83, deficit  3.46, CutoffScore  36.90, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAGUAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -10.08, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore  22.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UCAUUGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -14.33, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore  12.18, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAACAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.89, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  39.06, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGUGAAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -8.80, deficit  3.63, CutoffScore  59.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UUCACAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -12.32, deficit  7.15, CutoffScore   2.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAAGGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.57, deficit  3.66, CutoffScore  31.67, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
AGUGAUUCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.24, deficit  0.49, CutoffScore  36.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAUUAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.88, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  30.36, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
GGAGUUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.25, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  35.85, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUAAGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -7.55, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  62.96, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGUGUACAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -9.78, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore  28.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CACUAAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.44, deficit  5.27, CutoffScore  13.70, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGCAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.49, deficit  6.42, CutoffScore  29.53, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGUUCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  16.10, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CCAAAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -6.36, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
CGUUAAUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -9.71, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore  46.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
UUUAACGCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.78, deficit  5.48, CutoffScore  18.92, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCGAUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -10.96, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  25.23, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCGUCGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.62, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore  43.65, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GUGAAUGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.63, deficit  1.60, CutoffScore  57.74, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAAGGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -10.65, deficit  3.17, CutoffScore  20.30, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAAAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score     -11.34, deficit  4.90, CutoffScore  31.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAGAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -10.22, deficit  5.59, CutoffScore  27.85, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CAGAAGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -9.06, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  42.76, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GUAAACUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -8.91, deficit  3.57, CutoffScore  26.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
CUUGAAAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -11.46, deficit  5.37, CutoffScore  43.52, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCCGUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.76, deficit  5.67, CutoffScore  10.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GGUUAAUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score     -10.88, deficit  4.86, CutoffScore  36.84, ed  2, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
UUCCCUGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -14.62, deficit  7.25, CutoffScore  33.44, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCAACCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.54, deficit  4.24, CutoffScore  25.86, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAAACGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.92, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore   1.37, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUUCAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.49, deficit  6.42, CutoffScore  12.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGUAGUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.91, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore  29.39, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAUCUUGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.81, deficit  5.44, CutoffScore  23.68, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGUCGUGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -10.99, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  52.63, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
UUGACUAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -11.04, deficit  4.48, CutoffScore  24.63, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCGAUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.08, deficit  2.89, CutoffScore  22.53, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAAUGGAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -13.27, deficit  5.93, CutoffScore  27.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
UUACACCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -11.88, deficit  4.81, CutoffScore   2.11, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGGAACAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -8.37, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore  47.16, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUUCCAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -7.90, deficit  2.32, CutoffScore  62.60, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGGAAAUAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.30, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  35.89, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAUACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -11.39, deficit  5.77, CutoffScore  13.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGGAGGGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -12.00, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  32.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUUUAAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.48, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore  53.83, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
AAUCCAAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -8.31, deficit  2.73, CutoffScore  38.63, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UCCGCGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -13.09, deficit  5.02, CutoffScore  33.16, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGGGCAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score      -9.75, deficit  2.87, CutoffScore  47.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCAAAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.98, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  31.57, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score     -12.89, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore  17.68, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAAAGAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.24, deficit  2.32, CutoffScore  41.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GGGGUUUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -13.02, deficit  5.64, CutoffScore   4.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGUCAAGGGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.22, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  16.16, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUCACGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -17.68, deficit  9.91, CutoffScore  20.47, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CGUGUCUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score      -9.47, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  47.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.26, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  33.21, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGGGGUGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -12.31, deficit  7.29, CutoffScore   7.15, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GGUGCUGUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.71, deficit  4.43, CutoffScore  25.11, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAACAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.44, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  24.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAACCCAACU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.15, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  14.56, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAGAAAUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.13, deficit  5.09, CutoffScore  18.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GACACGAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -13.24, deficit  8.61, CutoffScore  27.70, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
UUUUUACGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.94, CutoffScore  22.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUAUCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -10.11, deficit  2.73, CutoffScore  23.78, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCAAGAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.27, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  50.00, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CACGGCCGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.50, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  16.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAUCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.44, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  69.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCGUAAUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.13, deficit  5.50, CutoffScore  27.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGGAGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -11.71, deficit  3.63, CutoffScore  23.35, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGUCUUCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -9.51, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  47.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAACAUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.98, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  11.63, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CACGAGUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.99, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore   9.53, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUUCGGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.58, deficit  2.99, CutoffScore  15.48, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGUGAGAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.09, deficit  2.80, CutoffScore  47.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCAAUUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.62, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  10.49, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGACGAAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.42, deficit  4.13, CutoffScore  21.00, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCUUCGAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.08, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  69.65, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGCACUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -10.18, deficit  5.11, CutoffScore  36.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGUAAAGUAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.85, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  59.85, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCCAAGACGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -11.00, deficit  2.69, CutoffScore  41.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGCUUAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -13.88, deficit  5.80, CutoffScore   1.64, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUUGAAUCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.10, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  40.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUAGUAGCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.04, deficit  7.41, CutoffScore  17.69, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGCUUCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -12.75, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  24.45, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGGAGCAGAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.92, deficit  2.85, CutoffScore  28.13, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCUUCAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -12.46, deficit  5.96, CutoffScore  11.40, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GGUGAAACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.83, deficit  4.52, CutoffScore   9.65, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAUAGGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  17.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAAGGUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.27, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  50.00, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAAAGUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.86, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  55.46, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
UGAAGGCCAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score      -9.57, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  31.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUCACAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.50, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  33.49, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GAAUGUAUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -12.16, deficit  7.82, CutoffScore  15.92, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
CGCCCAAAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.41, deficit  9.34, CutoffScore  20.90, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UGUUUUUUUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.82, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  10.92, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUAUGCAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore   7.12, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCUGUGAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.97, deficit  5.23, CutoffScore  20.20, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGAGCCGCUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.45, deficit  5.33, CutoffScore  26.78, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAUCCGGCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -11.91, deficit  2.97, CutoffScore   6.84, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAGGUAAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -13.26, deficit  3.71, CutoffScore   1.30, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGAAACCUGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.36, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore  16.95, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAGAAUCCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  12.98, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGGAAAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -11.75, deficit  5.28, CutoffScore  11.46, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
GCCAAGUCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.70, deficit  5.05, CutoffScore  16.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UAUUUAAAAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.26, deficit  2.61, CutoffScore  31.21, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CCAAAACGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore   9.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUAAAUUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.66, deficit  5.37, CutoffScore  13.10, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
UUCUGGGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score      -8.49, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  55.25, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GAAUGAAUACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -9.15, deficit  0.83, CutoffScore  34.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCAGAAUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -17.75, deficit  7.01, CutoffScore  10.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GUAAAAUGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score      -9.04, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  69.26, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCAUGACAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.44, deficit  5.30, CutoffScore  24.93, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCAAAACGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.84, deficit  7.77, CutoffScore  29.00, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUGGAUCAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -10.53, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore  41.43, ed  3, 2 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAUUCCUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -14.63, deficit  6.85, CutoffScore  29.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUUCAUACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -14.34, deficit  8.05, CutoffScore   8.13, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CCAAAGCGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.12, deficit  1.78, CutoffScore  19.31, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCAGAACCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.26, deficit  7.44, CutoffScore   9.10, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGAAUGGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -11.63, deficit  2.68, CutoffScore  27.27, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AGAGCAAUAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -15.90, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore   5.59, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CCUUCAAAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -10.55, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  10.19, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUUGUCCGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -15.18, deficit  6.31, CutoffScore  14.96, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGAACGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -13.31, deficit  8.97, CutoffScore  10.17, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
GAAUUAAAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score      -9.96, deficit  1.70, CutoffScore  32.78, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGGUGUGCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.74, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  18.63, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUCAAAAUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.72, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  11.51, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUACUGAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score      -9.15, deficit  2.63, CutoffScore  25.13, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
GAAGAGAUGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.94, deficit  3.17, CutoffScore  16.75, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAUCUCUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -12.50, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  31.00, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCUCCCAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -15.81, deficit  7.74, CutoffScore  34.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUACAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  23.08, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUUCAGGUAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.10, deficit  5.12, CutoffScore  21.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGGAUCUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  23.08, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUAACGGACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23010.1,  8 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.34, deficit  3.53, CutoffScore   8.44, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCGUUGUGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.07, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  16.04, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAUCUAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -14.53, deficit 10.19, CutoffScore   4.06, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
AGGAUUGGUAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -17.04, deficit  3.82, CutoffScore  14.44, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GAAGCCGAUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -16.19, deficit  5.94, CutoffScore   8.72, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CAAACAAGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.35, deficit  5.57, CutoffScore  12.14, ed  5, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CUGAUCGUCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.07, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  16.46, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUUAAAUAUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.16, deficit  5.55, CutoffScore   8.76, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUCCCAAUACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.51, deficit  0.90, CutoffScore  19.13, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUUUAGUAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -13.75, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore   2.28, ed  4, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAAAACACUUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore  16.55, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAUGGGGACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -16.87, deficit 10.39, CutoffScore   0.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CAUGGGAAAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.21, deficit  3.13, CutoffScore  38.69, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUGCAUUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -13.51, deficit  5.18, CutoffScore   3.60, ed  6, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAAGAGAUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.26, deficit  4.15, CutoffScore   3.33, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCUUUCAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -15.72, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore   2.98, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAAACACUGAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.09, deficit  7.31, CutoffScore   3.46, ed  6, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CAUCACCCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -17.57, deficit  9.49, CutoffScore   6.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGAAAGUUAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.65, deficit  3.54, CutoffScore   6.99, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGUUUUCCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.85, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore  11.78, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUGAGAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -15.88, deficit  8.07, CutoffScore  17.81, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAACCGUAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.09, deficit  7.31, CutoffScore  18.44, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CUAAGGAUAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.99, deficit  5.25, CutoffScore  20.11, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGUUCCCGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -17.12, deficit  9.34, CutoffScore   8.28, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CGGUAAAUUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.68, deficit  5.28, CutoffScore  10.56, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GGAAAACUUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.21, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  15.64, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGCAGAUUGUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -13.44, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore   4.72, ed  6, 5 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CGAGCCUCAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -12.82, deficit  3.29, CutoffScore  14.86, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGCCGAAAAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.25, deficit  5.85, CutoffScore   7.64, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GGAAUGGUUUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score      -8.63, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  66.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CAAAAAAAGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.63, deficit  5.77, CutoffScore  28.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUCCUCUAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -16.51, deficit  8.18, CutoffScore   3.61, ed  3, 3 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAGCAUUCCGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.32, deficit  4.17, CutoffScore   5.23, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUAAACGCAUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -17.19, deficit  3.96, CutoffScore  13.47, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGGGCAGAUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.33, deficit  5.93, CutoffScore   7.20, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
AUUAAGACGAUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.56, deficit  2.34, CutoffScore  24.31, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
AGUCUAAGAUACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.17, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore  13.19, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CUGAUGGCCACUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74055.2, 13 NTs,       CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG,score     -18.15, deficit 12.01, CutoffScore   3.97, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW             
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 92.0000	  8.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 84.0000	  4.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 52.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 18.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 76.0000	 62.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 98.0000	 60.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 90.0000	 56.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 48.0000	 12.0000
[8 8]	 98.0000	 40.0000	 14.0000
[9 9]	100.0000	 14.0000	  2.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  73 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence 120 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence 170 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence 177 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 279 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 281 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 281 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 285 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 286 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 301 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 301 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 304 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 310 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 313 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 332 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 334 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 338 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 368 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 374 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 381 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 396 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 413 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 425 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 439 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 448 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 453 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 483 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 496 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 508 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 542 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 555 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 558 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 558 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 586 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 657 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 661 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 682 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 686 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 727 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 760 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 784 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 840 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 883 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 913 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 940 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 967 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 982 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 1119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 1122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 1157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 1166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 1212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 1320 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 1373 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 1399 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 1421 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 1658 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 1661 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1873 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1885 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 2023 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 2056 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 2233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 2287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 1.7166%
Number of models giving false positives is 240 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.42
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     0.77
